Functional 2 word phrases free#

Functional 2 word phrases free#

Moreover, the regular free phrase does not enter speech as a ready-made unit like the word it is freely formed in speech, like the sentence according to a certain grammatical pattern. Like the word, the phrase is a nominative unit, but it provides a complex nomination of the referent, a polynomination consisting of several (at least two) nominative components, presenting the referent as a complicated phenomenon, cf.: a girl – a beautiful girl a decision – his unexpected decision etc. As a level-forming unit (see Unit 1), it is characterized by some common and some differential features with the unit of the lower level, the word, and the unit of the upper level, the sentence. The phrase is the syntactic unit used as a notional part of a sentence. The main object of study in syntax is the communicative unit of the language, the sentence. The correlation of the phrase and the word, of the phrase and the sentence. The phrase as a polynominatlve lingual unit.

this subdivision of grammar is known as syntax. Sentences are further subdivided into simple and composite: composite sentences are subdivided into complex and compound, etc. The parts of speech are further subdivided into nouns, verbs, adjective, adverbs, functional parts of speech this subdivision of grammar is known as morphology. For example, within the grammatical system we single out parts of speech and sentence patterns. Morphology and syntax - the two main sections of grammar.Įach sub-system distinguishes not only its own set of elements, but its own structural organization. Give example of indirect question sentence. Notional phrases are subdivided into different types, which reveal various grammatical and semantic properties of the phrase constituents and the phrase in general. Functional phrases are combinations of functional words similar to regular functional words, e.g.: apart from, as soon as, with reference to, must be able, etc. The formative phrase is a combination of a notional word with a functional word, which is contextually dependent (“synsemantic”) and functionally similar to separate notional words used in various grammatical forms, e.g.: of Peter (= Peter’s) in a moment, without doubt, etc. Besides notional phrases (phrases proper), two other structural types of syntagmatic groupings of words can be distinguished, which can be defined as phrases or word-combinations only in form: formative phrases and functional phrases. Critical revision of these two approaches is possible on the basis of the above given description of the phrase (the phraseme) as a separate lingual unit.ĭefining the phrase as a polynominative lingual unit helps reveal the status of notional phrases, semantically independent (“autosemantic”) combinations of notional words, as the basic type of phrasemes.

Burlakova, defines a word-combination as any syntactically organized group of syntagmatically connected words thisincludes combinations of functional and notional words, and predicative and coordinative combinations of words. One of the leading specialists in this field, V. A much broader approach was proposed by Leonard Bloomfield and it is shared by many modern linguists. Vinogradov, traditionally prevails: only a combination of two notional words, one of which dominates the other, is considered a word-combination. In Russian linguistics, the narrow approach, which was put forward by V. The definition of the phrase is rather a controversial issue.